Ukrainian-Polish Yearbook OŚWIATOLOGIA/ОСВІТОЛОГІЯ

To link to this article: 
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2018.7.6571

Kharchenko Tetiana,
ORCID iD 0000-0002-4480-1585, 
Doctor of Sciences in Education, Associate Professor, Professor of Roman Philology and Comparative-and-Typological Philology Department, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 13-b Tymoshenko Str., 04212 Kyiv, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Zvereva Maryna,
ORCID iD 0000-0002-5967-6924,
PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Romance Philology and Comparative-and-Typological Philology Department, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 13-b Tymoshenko Str., 04212 Kyiv, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  

Western European Researchers on the Conditions of Effective Transformation of a Teacher’s Professional Habitus during the Seminars Analyzing Practices 

The article deals with the notion of «habitus». It means a combination of codes and abilities obtained in an early age, the way an individual applies them under different conditions. It dwells upon the studies of Western European researchers of education theory and practice on the conditions of effective transformation of a teacher’s professional habitus. One of the conditions is the implementation of a global clinic approach understood as a permanent alteration of theory and practice in the teacher training process. They argue that theoretical knowledge accumulated beyond the context of actions is not possible to mobilize and is not mobilized to solve professional problems.

There are five important issues of organizing the teacher clinic training suggested by the Western European researchers of theory and practice of education in the late 20^th century. One of them is the organization of collective analysis seminars on practices within the professional educational training. According to the above mentioned researchers, participating in a group analyzing practices serves as an introduction to the personal reflective practice and stimulatesthe development and transformation of the personality of reflexive teacher-practitioner (in other words, the development and transformation of the teacher, possessing developed reflexive skills, directed onto self-analysis of his or her own professional actions, behavior style, internal state; this is the teacher who is able to make professional decisions and to act by himself or herself; this is the one who takes responsibility for his or her decisions and actions.)

The article reveals the conditions when the collective analysis of practices can enhance changes in educational practices and behavior of a teacher. In their opinion, the teacher’s personality changes can be possible provided the analysis of the practices is relevant, accepted by a teacher and integrated by him or her into the professional activity.

Key words: education training;  practices analysis;  teacher’s habitus;  teacher’s personality transformation;  Western Europe.

References

Pro osvitu (2017). Zakon Ukrajiny from 05.09.2017. № 38-38 [Law of Ukraine «About Education» 05.09.2017. № 38-38]. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19/page (ukr).

Kharchenko, T. H. (2011). Rozvytok osobystosti vchytelia-refleksyvnoho praktyka iak priorytetna skladova protsesu humanizatsii pedahohichnoi osvity u Frantsii v druhij polovyni XX stolittia [The Development of the teacher’s individuality of reflexive practitioner as a prioritized component of humanization process of pedagogical education in France in the second part of the 20^th century]. Visnyk Luhans'koho natsional'noho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka : Pedahohichni nauky, 5(216), 138–152 (ukr).

Kharchenko, T. H. (2011). Klinichnyj pidkhid do formuvannia osobystosti vchytelia-refleksyvnoho praktyka u Frantsii [Clinical аapproach toward the formation of teacher’s individuality of the reflexive practitioner in France]. Porivnial'no-pedahohichni studii, 1(7), 145–152 (ukr).

Kharchenko, T. H. (2017). Seminary analizu praktyk u profesiinii pidhotovtsi vchyteliv u krainakh Zakhidnoi Yevropy [Seminars for the analysis of teachers' professional training in Western European countries]. Oświatologia, 6, 169–175 (ukr).

Altet, M. (1992). Une formation professionnelle par l’analyse des pratiques et l’utilisation d’outils conceptuels issus de la recherche: modes cognitifs et modes d’ajustement [Professional education on the basis of practice analysis and the usage of conceptual instruments of the scientific research]. Les Siences de l’Éducation pour l’ère nouvelle, 1/2, 27–58 (fr).

Altet, M. (1996). Les compétences de l’enseignant professionnel. Entre savoirs, schèmes d’action et adaptation : le savoir-analyser [Competences of the professional educator. Between knowledge, action schemes and adaptation: the ability to analyze]. In L. Paquay, M. Altet, E. Charlier, & Ph. Perrenoud,  Former des enseignants professionnels. Paris, Bruxelles: De Bœck Université, (рр. 27–40) (fr).

Altet, M. (2000). L’analyse de pratiques : Une démarche de formation professionnalisante? [Practice analysis : Professional academic process ?]. Recherche et formation : Formes et dispositifs de la professionnalisation, 35, 25–39 (fr).

Blanchard-Laville,  C., & Fablet, D. (1996). L’analyse des pratiques professionnelles[The analysis of the professional pratice]. Paris, France: L’Harmattan (fr).

Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Paris, France: Seuil (fr).

Bussienne, É., & Tozzi, M. (1996). Analysons nos pratiques professionnelles [We analyse our professional practice]. Cahiers pédagogiques (septembre), 346, 10–63 (fr).

Champy-Remoussenard, P., & Rothan, M. (1999). De la mise en mots du travail à l’analyse des pratiques professionnelles : La formation d’étudiants de licence de Sciences de l’éducation [From theory to analysis of the professional activity :  Training of licentiate students in pedagogic]. Recherche et formation: Formation continue des enseignants: les MAFPEN et Après, 32, 163–184 (fr).

Dias-Chiaruttini, A. (2011). Former les enseignants au débat interprétatif : places et enjeux des styles enseignants [Teachers’ training to professional activity : different styles of teachers’ work]. Repères : recherches en didactique du français langue maternelle, 44. Retrieved from http://reperes.revues.org/170 (fr).

Lamy, M. et al. (1996). L’analyse des pratiques en vue du transfert des réussites [Practice analysis with the purpose of sharing experience]. Paris, France: Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche (fr).

Maillebouis, M., & Vascencellos, M-D. (1997). Un nouveau regard sur l’action éducative : l’analyse des pratiques professionnelles [New approach to educational action: the analysis of professional practice]. Perspectives documentaires en éducation, 41, 35–67 (fr).

Perrenoud, Ph. (1998). De l’alternance à l’articulation entre théories et pratiques dans la formation des enseignants [From alternation to theory connection with practice in the field of pedagogical education]. In M. Tardif, C. Lessard & C. Gauthier, Formation des maîtres et contextes sociaux. Perspectives internationales. Paris, France: PUF, (рр. 153–199) (fr).

Perrenoud, Ph. (1998). De l’analyse de l’expérience au travail par situations-problèmes en formation des enseignants [From experience analysis to work over problematic situations]. In E. Triquet, & C. Fabre-Col, Recherche (s) et formation des enseignants, (рр. 89–105) (fr).

Perrenoud, Ph. (2001). Développer la pratique réflexive dans le métier d’enseignant [The development of reflexive practice in teacher’s profession]. Paris, France: ESF éditeur (fr).

Perrenoud, Ph. (2011). Le travail sur l’habitus dans la formation des enseignants. Analyse des pratiques et prise de conscience [Work over habitus in teachers’ training. Practice analysis and understanding].  In L. Paquay, M. Altet, & E. Charlier, Former des enseignants professionnels: Quelles stratégies? Quelles compétences? Bruxelles : De Bœck, (рр. 181–208) (fr).