Page 30 of 30
Kulbashna Yaroslava,
O. Bogomolets National Medical University, Professor of the Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Doctor of Education, MD:  13 Shevchenko B., 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Astapenko Olena,
O. Bogomolets National Medical University, Assosiate Professor of the Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Doctor of Medicinee: 13 Shevchenko B., 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

DOI: 10.28925/2226-3012.2016.5.173179
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2016.5.173179

EDUCATIONAL ASSESMENT IN TRAINING OF COMPETENT DOCTORS IN UKRAINE: PROBLEMS AND THEIR DECISION

In article deals with the problem of the use of educational assessment in the training of future doctors in Ukraine. The key role of educational assessment in the improvement of the quality of higher medical education was defined. The basic stages of educational assessment methods in historical perspective are presented. Specifies, that educational assessment is one of the components of educationalexpertise. Analysis the use of the most common method of educational assessment – testing was found, that it plays an important but only supporting role in determining the level of formation of professional competence of future doctor. The successful experience of foreign countries indicates that for the increasing of objectiveness of the educational outcomes estimation need to get information from multiple information sources. Above all, to confirm the academic achievements of future doctors is necessary at first to base on their self- assessment. These data are supplemented with the preliminary assessment of teachers, the results of the test control and eventually should be interpreted and compared with current estimates in discipline. Such integrated approach helps identify problematic aspects of the future doctors training, find decisions to remove them and draft the perspectives of future learning outcomes. Besides, the development of tests should be based on the principles of competence approach, focusing on the mechanisms of multiple knowledge integration and practical orientation of them.
The analysis of scientific sources and own teaching experience shows that the effectiveness of solving problems in  educational assessment in high medical school, including dental education, largely depends on the creation of a comprehensive system of quality assessment of higher medical education at the national level, expert teams in each higher medical schools; implementation of integrated and differentiated approach into the process of educational assessment; training of experts in field of educational assessment. Decreasing of efficiency test method is seen in insufficient theoretical and methodological support of educational assessment process in general and testing process in particular.
Key words: higher medical education;  expertise; competentive approach;  educationalassessment; educationaldiagnostic; self-evaluation;  doctors training;  testing;  quality of higher education.

REFERENCES

1. Boliubash Ia.Ia., Bulakh I.Ie., Mruha M.R., Filonchuk I.V. (2007). Pedahohichne otsiniuvannia i testuvannia: pravyla, standarty, vidpovidalnist [Teacher evaluation and testing, rules, standards, responsibility.]. K.: Maister-klas, 272 (ukr).

2. Bulakh I. Ie., Mruha M. R. (2009). Zastosuvannia mizhnarodnykh dokumentiv dlia zabezpechennia yakosti pedahohichnoho otsiniuvannia v Ukraini  [Use of internationaldocuments for quality control of educational assessment in Ukraine. Available at: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/old_jrn/e-journals/ITZN/em8/content/08bijuia.htm (ukr).

3. Honcharov S.M. (2006). Interaktyvni tekhnolohii navchannia v kredytno-modulnii systemi orhanizatsii navchalnoho protsesu [Interactive learning technologies in credit-modular system of educational process]. Rivne: NUVHP, 172 (ukr).

4. Humeniuk V. (2013). Otsiniuvannia yakosti vyshchoi medychnoi osvitiy u kontekst navchannia inozemnykh studentiv v UKraini [Quality assessment of higher medical education in contest of foreign students training in Ukraine]. Porivnialno-pedahohichni studii, 2-3 (16-17), 186 -192 (ukr).

5. Ynhenkamp K. (1991). Pedahohycheskaia dyahnostyka [Educational diagnostic]. M.: Pedahohyka,  240 (rus).

6. Kulbashna Ia. (2014). Formuvannia profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh fakhivtsiv iz stomatolohohii: teoretychni i metodychni osnovy : monohrafiiap[Formation of professional competence of future dentists: theoretical and methodological foundations: monograph]. K. : Kompas, 416  (ukr).

7. Martynenko S. (2015). Metodolohichnyi aspekt pedahohichnoi diahnostyky u vymiri osobystisno-rozvyvalnoi osvity [Methodological aspects of educational assessment to measure student-developmental education]. Osvitolohiia, 4, 19-23 (ukr).

8. Liashenko O. I., Lukina T. O., Bulakh I. Ie., Mruha M. R. (2012). Metodyka i tekhnolohii otsiniuvannia diialnosti zahalnoosvitnoho navchalnoho zakladu: posibnyk [Methodology and Technology Assessment of educational institution]. K.: Pedahohichna dumka,160 (ukr).

9. Kanivets T.M. (2012). Osnovy pedahohichnoho otsiniuvannia: [navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk][ Basics of educational assessment]. Nizhyn: Vydavets PP Lysenko M.M.,102 (ukr).

10. Lykhachov B.T. Pedahohika (2001). Kurs lektsii [Pedagogy: Lectures]. M.: Yurait-M, 607 (rus).

11. Ohnev’iuk V., Sysoieva S.  (2015). Pidhotovka ekspertiv u haluzi osvity v Ukraini [Training experts in education in the Ukraine].  Osvitolohiia, 4, 54-60 (ukr).

12. Ponomarenko N. (2015). Ekspertyza v osviti: osoblyvosti, funktsii, typy [Expertise in Education: features, functions, types]. Osvitolohiia, 4, 61-64. DOI: 10.28925/2226-3012.2015.4.6164

13. Gadbury-Amyot C.C, M.S.NcCracen, J.L.Woldt, R.L.Brennan (2014). Validity and Reliability of Portfolio Assessment of Student Competence in Two Dental School Populations: A Four-Year Study. Journal of Dental Education.  May, Vol. 78,  5, 657–668  (eng).

14. Friedlander L., Anderson V. (2011). A new Predoctoral Endodontic Module Evaluating Learning and Effectiveness. Journal of Dental Education, Vol.75, 3,351- 359 (eng).  

15. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (2014). DOI: 10.1080/01421590701775453

16. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teacher 2007;29(9–10):855–71. DOI: 10.1080/01421590701775453

17. Chambers DW. (1993). Toward a competency-based curriculum. Journal of Dental Education, 57(11), 790–3 (eng).

18. Manogue M., Kelly M, Masaryk SB, Brown G., et al (2002). Evolving methods of assessment European Journal of Dental Education, 6(Suppl 3), 53–66. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.6.s3.8.x

19. Albino JEN., Young SK, Neumann LM, et al. (2008) Assessing dental students’ competence: best practice recommendations in the performance assessment literature and investigation of current practices in predoctoral dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 72(12),1405–35 (eng).

20. Moss, P. A. Girard, B.J., Haniford, L.C. (2006) Validity in Educational Assessment / Moss, P. A., Girard, B.J., Haniford, L.C. Reviwe of research in education. Vol. 30, 1, 109-162. DOI:  10.3102/0091732x030001109 

Full Text: PDF (ukr.)

CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENT TENDENCIES OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN FRANCE

Alla Durdas

10.28925/2518-7635.2017.2.10

http://edreview.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/edreview/article/view/42