Page 26 of 30
Oleksyuk Olga,
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Head of Chair of Theory and Methods ofMusical Art, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 18/2 Davydova, 02152 Kyiv, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

DOI: 10.28925/2226-3012.2016.5.152157
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2016.5.152157

ANTHROPOLOGICAL TURN IN ARTISTIC PEDAGOGY - «GOLD» SECTION CENTURIES

Postnonclassical ideas of anthropological pedagogy are closely linked with the modernization process of higher art education. Heuristic perspectives of the anthropological principles is fruitful in studying of future specialists’ spiritual potential mechanisms. Returns soul to methodical and academic discourse contributes just spiritual education potential of the individual to which the soul is a basic cultural concept, and one of the principles of the content is implementation of the human soul’s psychological law in the unity of knowledge, feeling and will. Knowing the unique laws of the spiritual world in the process of interaction with the environment, the person has the choice of development’s ways. Thus the problem of the individual’s spiritual potential in the arts, her professional growth, ability to self-reflection and formation of global competency in a new covered through humanistic orientation of postnonclassical pedagogy. Contemporary art education only approaching to the study of human development’s patterns as a whole, but today we know that the spirituality of person and his subjectivity depends on the integration of emotional, intellectual, motivational, cognitive and other personal areas.Anthropological turn in art pedagogy initiates its fundamental modern form, is due to integration and humanization of knowledge about person in different cultural contexts.
Key words: anthropological turn;  art education;  education paradigm;  postnonclassical education;  spiritual development.


REFERENCES

1.            Asadullin R. M. (2011). Puti poznanija sushhnosti cheloveka [The Path of knowledge of human nature]. Pedagogika, 8. (rus.).

2.            Bim-Bad B. M. (2010). Aksiomy pedagogiki [Axioms of pedagogy]. Pedagogika, 2, 19-23. (rus.).

3.            Verbic'kij A. A. (2014). Metodologicheskie osnovy realizacii novoj obrazovatel'noj paradigmy [Methodological bases of implementation of the new educational paradigm]. Pedagogika, 2, 3-14. (rus.).

4.            Dneprov Je. D. Fenomen Ushinskogo [The phenomenon Ushinskogo] [Electronic resource]. Available at:  http://www.bim-bad.ru/biblioteka/article_full.php?aid=705 (rus.).

5.            Zinchenko V. P. (1995). Affekt i intellekt v obrazovanii [Affect and intelligence in education]. M.: Trivola, 64. (rus.).

6.            Zinchenko V. P. (2002). O dushe i ee vospitanii [On the Soul and her upbringing]. Razvitie lichnosti, 1, 54-83. (rus.).

7.            Ivanov V. V. (2014). Mesto semiotiki kul'tury sredi nauk o cheloveke v ХХІ st. [Place of semiotics of culture among the human sciences in the XXI century]. Chelovek v istorii, istorija v soslagatel'nom naklonenii. M., 86-87. (rus.).

8.            Kukushin V. S. (2002). Obshhie osnovy pedagogiki [General principles of pedagogy].  Rostov-na-Donu : MarT, 224. (rus.).

9.            Lipskaja L. A. (2006). Filosofsko-antropologicheskij fundament sovremennogo obrazovanija [Philosophical and anthropological foundation of modern education]. Pedagogika, 2, 23-28. (rus.).

10.          Mishatina N. L. (2014). Kakie obrazovatel'nye rezul'taty my formiruem i ocenivaem? [What educational results we generate and evaluate?]. Pedagogіka, 2. (rus.).

11.          Oleksiuk O. M. (2015). Kontseptualni osnovy postneklasychnoi mystetskoi pedahohiky [Conceptual framework Postnonclassical artistic pedagogy]: Proceedings of the International Conference (Nizhyn, 24-25 kvitnia 2015 r.).  V. V. Revenchuk (Ed.). Nizhyn : NDU im. M. Hoholia, 3-4. (ukr.).

12.          Oleksiuk O. M. (2013). Muzychna pedahohika : navch. posib. [Music pedagogy: Tutorial]. K.: Kyiv. un-t im. B. Hrinchenka, 218-219. (ukr.).

13.          Oleksiuk O. M. (2010). Pedahohichni zasady realizatsii dukhovnoho potentsialu vyshchoi mystetskoi osvity [Pedagogical Principles of realization of spiritual potential of higher art education]. Vyshcha osvita Ukrainy. Teoretychnyi ta naukovo-metodychnyi chasopys. Kyiv, Instytut vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy. (ukr.).

14.          Pichugina V. K. (2016). Gumanitarnaja paradigma kak perspektiva preodolenija metodologicheskogo krizisa v pedagogike [Humanitarian paradigm as a methodological perspective of overcoming the crisis in pedagogy]. Pedagogika, 1, 19-30. (rus.).

15.          Tul'chinskij G. L. (2009). Novaja antropologija: lichnost' v perspektive postchelovechnosti [New anthropology: the person in the future post humanity]. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 41-56.  (rus.).

16.          Ushinskij K. D. (2002). Pedagogicheskaja antropologija: Chelovek kak predmet vospitanija. Opyt pedagogicheskoj antropologii [Pedagogical Anthropology: Man as the subject of education. Experience of pedagogical anthropology]. M.: Izd-vo URAO, 496. (rus.).

17.          Khoruzhyi S. S. (2008). Teatr sytuatsii [Theater of situations]. Byblyoteka «Ynstytuta Synerhyinoi Antropolohyy», 430. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://synergia-isa.ru/?page_id=4301#H (ukr.).

18. Johnson Ph. (2002). A metacognitive affective approach to values education.  Melbourne. (eng).

 Full Text: PDF (ukr.)

Cited-by:

Yajun, W. (2018). Pedagogical conditions of the formation of the communicative culture of the future teacher of musical art in the process of conducting and choral education. Musical art in the educological discourse, 3. DOI: 10.28925/2518-766X.2018.3.125131