Batechko Nina,
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Scientific and Research Laboratory of Education Studies of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 13-b Tymoshenko Street, 04212 Kyiv, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

DOI: 10.28925/2226-3012.2016.5.6975
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2016.5.6975


FORMATION OF THE STATE EDUCATION POLICY: SYNERGETIC ASPECT

The article is dedicated to the problems of formation of the state education policy. The trends of the evolution of views on the nature and the concept of the «state education policy» in the light of the processes of educational reform in Ukraine have been outlined. It has been proved that in the current context of globalization and internationalization, when education acquires the traits of openness and non-linearity, the principles of educational environment management and the nature of the interaction between participants of the educational process are changing, and there is an urgent need to overcome the simplistic and outdated view of the state education policy. Based on the synergetic theory of the complex open systems, there have been substantiated theoretical and methodological grounds of the process of formation of the state education policy. The essence of the application of the synergetic approach to the studied phenomenon has been considered, relying on the basic laws of synergy, openness, non-linearity, disequilibrium, chaos postulating, bifurcational states, fluctuation phenomena and the theory of self-organization. The state education policy has been considered as an open, non-linear system, which is self-organizing and self-developing and depends on the external environment and internal specifics of the development of higher education sphere in Ukraine.
Key words: state education policysynergetics;  synergetic approachopennessnon-linearitynon-equilibriumbifurcational stateself-organization.

REFERENCES

1. Andrushchenko V. P. (2015). Osvita, yak kliuchovyi chynnyk suchasnykh tsyvilizatsiinykh protsesiv [Education as a key factor in modern civilization processes]. Osvitnia polityka: filosofiia, teoriia, praktyka [monohrafiia]. K. Vyd-vo NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova. (ukr)

2.      Andrushchenko V. P. (2016). Suchasna derzhavna osvitnia polityka Ukrainy: sproba prohnostychnoho analizu [Modern national educational policy Ukraine: attempt to predictive analysis]. Proceedings of the II International Conference «Formation of the national education policy: philosophical, theoretical and applied aspects». Kyiv, 4-12. (ukr)

3.      Andrushchenko V. P. (2010). Osvitnia polityka (ohliad poriadku dennoho) [Education policy (review of the agenda)]. K.: «MP Lesia», 386. (ukr)

4.      Entsyklopediia osvity [Encyclopedia of education]. V. H. Kremen (Ed.). K.: Yurin-kom Inter, 2008, 1040. (ukr)

5.      Zasiekina L. V. (2010). Psykholohichni zasady rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini [Psychological principles of development of higher education in Ukraine]. Psykholohichni perspektyvy, 16, 40-50. (ukr)

6.      Kremen V. H. (2005). Osvita i nauka v Ukraini: innovatsiinyi aspekt. Stratehiia. Realizatsiia. Rezultaty [Education and science in Ukraine: innovative aspect. Strategy. Realization. Results]. K.: Hramota, 448. (ukr)

7.      Kremen V. H. (2012). Synerhetyka v osviti: kontekst liudynotsentryzmu: Monohrafiia [Synergetics in Education: Monograph]. K.: Pedahohichna dumka, 368. (ukr)

8.      Kushnir V. A. (2001). Systemnyi analiz pedahohichnoho protsesu: metodolohichnyi aspekt: Monohrafiia [A systematic analysis of educational process: methodological aspect: Monograph]. Kirovohrad: Vydavnychyi tsentr KDPU, 338. (ukr)

9.      Lukina T. O. (2004). Derzhavne upravlinnia yakistiu zahalnoi serednoi osvity v Ukraini: [monohrafiia] [State administration of quality of secondary education in Ukraine: [monograph]]. K.: Vyd-vo NADU, 292. (ukr)

10.    Osvitni reformy: misiia, diisnist, refleksiia: monohrafiia [Educational reforms: mission, reality, reflection: monograph]. K.: TOV «Vydavnyche pidpryiemstvo» «EDELVEIS», 2013, 460. (ukr)

11.    Riabov S. H. (2005). Politychni nauka v Ukraini XXI stolittia: Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Political science in Ukraine in XXI Century: Status and Prospects]. K.: Navchalno-metodychnyi tsentr «Konsortsium iz udoskonalennia menedzhmentu osvity v Ukraini», 103. (ukr)

12.    Synerhetyka i tvorchist: monohrafiia [Synergetics and creativity: monograph].V. H. Kremen (Ed.). K: Instytut obdarovanoi dytyny, 2014, 314. (ukr)

13. Stepin V. S. (2003). Samorozvivajushhiesja sistemy i postneoklassicheskaja racional'nost' [Self-developing system and postnonclassical rationality]. Voprosy filosofii, 8, 5-19. (rus)

14. Hoy W., Miskel C. Educational administration / Theory. Research and Practice. – McGraw – HillInc. – 1996. – 495 p. (eng)

15. Teodorovic J. Why education policies fail: multiple streams model of policymaking / Jelena Teodorovic // Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања. – Јун 2008. – Р. 22-36. DOI: 10.2298/ZIPI0801022T



Full Text: PDF (ukr.)