Page 19 of 24

Valeriy Ryabenko – Ph. D in philosophical  sciences, leading researcher of Osvitology Lab, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University,  e-mail:  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

DOI: 10.28925/2226-3012.2015.4.99104 
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2015.4.99104  

V. Riabenko. Socio-historical and epistemological circumstances explanation for osvitology

Abstract
This article analyzes the deep socio-historical and epistemological circumstances explanation for osvitology. Their definition helps to explain the emergence of this new scientific field of education research and its interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary character. The author puts forward the hypothesis that the fundamental socio-historical factor in the formation, evolution and complex structure for osvitology is the development of social production. Its first historically, the highest and most universal form of production is production of a person. But at the dawn of the history of low levels of this form of production caused its disintegration into three components: material production, spiritual production and production of forms of social relations. For thousands of years these types of production developed relatively independently. But the impact of material production was dominant on them. Only in the mid-20th century material production loses its dominance. In the foreground we see first spiritual production, then production of forms of social relations, and finally, the production of a person. Production of a person is crucial is the most universal form of production. Production of a person again converted to the most universal and influential form of production. In turn, the most important component of production of a person is the production of his inorganic body. It takes place in education and training. These features and the general structure of the current state of social production is the main ontological factor which to some extent determines the complex structure and poliaspektnist for osvitology, which studies education. In epistemological plane priority have two factors the interpretation of the essence and structure for osvitology. On the one hand, it features a display ontological manifestations of the main types of production in some categorical mode of production. On the one hand, it a reflection of the main types of social production in categorical row mode of production. On the other - sequential movement of scientific knowledge of nature education from surface educational process to the deeper, hidden and unobvious its definitions: economic, political, social, legal, communication, organizational, spiritual, philosophical.

Keywords: education and learning production;  education learning process;  epistemology;  material production;  spiritual production;  production of a person;   production of forms of social relations:  inorganic body of a person;  organic body of a person; osvitology.

                                                                       References
1. Drucker P. F. Post-Capitalist Society. — Oxford Butterworth: Heinemann, 1993. – 468 р. [in English].

2. Kasworm Carol. The Influence of the Knowledge Society: Trends in Adult Higher Education [Elektronnij resurs] / The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59:104–107, 2011 Copyright © 2011, Association for Continuing Higher Education ISSN 0737-7363 DOI: 10.1080/07377363.2011.568830. – Режим доступу: http://www.carl-abrc.ca/uploads/h_ed_articles/Kasworm.pdf [in English].

3. Lane R. E. The Decline of Politics and Ideology in a Knowledge Society / R. E Lane // American Sociological Review. –  1966. – Vol. 31. – P. 649-662. [in English].

4. LugovijV. І. The problem of conceptual-categorical apparatus pedagogy / V. І. Lugovij // Pedagogіchna і psihologіchna nauki v Ukraїnі /vіdp. red. O. V. Suhomlins'ka. – K.: Pedagogіchna dumka, 2007. – T. 1. Teorіja ta іstorіja pedagogіki. – P. 24 – 35. [in Ukrainian].

5. Ognev’juk V. O.The philosophy of education and its place in the structure of scientific research of the phenomenon of education / V. O. Ognev’juk // Naukovo – metodichnij zhurnal «Shljah osvіti». – 2009. – № 4 (54). – P. 2 – 6. [in Ukrainian].

6. Ognev'jukV. O., SisoєvaS. O. Osvіtologіja – integrated scientific field research education / V. O. Ognevjuk, S. O. Sisoєva // Rіdna shk. : shhomіsjach. nauk.-ped. zhurn. – № 4-5 (988-989), kvіten'-traven', 2012. – 80 s. – P. 44 – 51. [in Ukrainian].

7. Pruel N. A. Productive consumption education in civil society // Innovation and Education. Proceedings of the conference. Series «Symposium», Issue 29. St. Petersburg .: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society, 2003. – P. 174 – 178. (in Russian).

8. Rjabenko V. A.Methodological function of the category of "spiritual production" / AN Ukrainy; In-t filosofii. Otv. Red. I. V. Bojchenko. – Kiev: Nauk. dumka, 1992. – 92 p. [in Russian].

9.SisoєvaS. O. Education as an object of study / S. O. Sisoєva // Shljah osvіti: naukovo-metodichnij zhurnal. – K.: Mіnіsterstvo osvіti і nauki Ukraїni, Nacіonal'na akademіja pedagogіchnih nauk Ukraїni, Asocіacіja pracіvnikіv gіmnazіj і lіceїv Ukraїni. – 2011. – № 2 – 48 p. – P. 5 – 11. [in Ukrainian].

10. Subetto A. I. The principle and structure of the laws of science of education - education of reference. Imperative neoclassical synthesis [Elektronnij resurs] / A. I. Subetto // «Akademija Trinitarizma». – M., 2003. – Jel. № 77-6567, publ.10892. – Rezhim dostupu: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0016/001a/00160053.htm [in Russian].

11. Valimaa J., Hoffman D. KnowledgeSociety Discource and Higher Education / J. Valimaa, D Hoffman // High Educ. – 2008. – № 56. – P. 265-285. [in English].

    Full Text: PDF (ukr)