Ponomarenko N. G., Senior lecturer of Foreign Languages Department, Nikolayev National Agrarian University

DOI: 10.28925/2226-3012.2015.4.6164
https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2015.4.6164

Ponomarenko N.G. EXPERT ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: FEATURES, FUNCTIONS AND TYPES

 Abstract

The article covers various approaches to defining the notion of "expert assessment in education or pedagogical expert assessment". It has been found that pedagogical expert assessment  is seen as a system of researching pedagogical phenomena, processes, problems, pedagogical activity results as well as forecasting the development of education, expert assessment of alternative solutions and identifying the best results of the educational process arrangement in order to improve the quality of education and provide counseling services to authors and staff in educational institutions. On the other hand, expert assessment is seen as a complex of scientific and research procedures aimed at  summarising the information received from experts to enable competent decision-making in the field of educational institutions management. It is highlighted that expert assessment is significantly different from such notions as "monitoring", "diagnostics", "audit" and "inspection". That is to say that the main purpose of monitoring is to prevent any possible failures in effective functioning of an object, while expert assessment maintains its development. Diagnostics can be conducted by any individual with the help of certain methods aimed at identifying the causes of positive and negative outcomes. One of the features of audit is that educational authorities are invited  by  the head of an educational institution. Inspections identify whether   or not schools meet the requirements and standards of the industry and make conclusions. In addition to the above, the key functions and types of expert assessment in education have been defined (analytical, developmental, counseling, diagnostic, reflexive and forecasting).

Key words: diagnostics; expert assessment; expert assessment in education; expert method of research; monitoring; pedagogical expert assessment.

 References

 1. Bratchenko S. L. Vvedenie v gumanitarnuju jekspertizu obrazovanija [Introduction to humanitarian educational evaluation] /  S. L.  Bratchenko – M. , 1999. – 137 s. (rus)

 2.  Bratchenko S. L. Mir jekspertizy – popytka opredelenija koordinat [The world of evaluation as an attempt of coordinates determination]  / S. L. Bratchenko // Jekspertiza v sovremennom mire: ot znanija k dejstvitel'nosti / pod. red. G. V. Ivanchenko, D. A. Leont'eva. – M. : Smysl, 2006. – S. 63-76. (rus)

 3.  Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy  [Large explanatory dictionary of modern Ukrainian] / uklad. i holov. red. V. T. Busel. – K. ; Irpin : VTF «Perun», 2002. – 1426 s. (ukr)

 4. Ivanov D. A. Jekspertiza v obrazovanii [Educational evaluation]: ucheb. posobie dlja stud. vysshih ucheb. zavedenij / D. A. Ivanov. — M. : Izdatel'skij centr «Akademija», 2008. — 336 s. (rus)

 5.  Kasyanova O. M. Kontrolno-analitytshna diyalnist kerivnyka navtshalnoho zakladu [Control and analytical activities of leader of educational establishment] / O. M. Kasyanova. — Kh. : Vyd. hrupa «Osnova», 2014. — 192 s. — (Seriya «Abetka kerivnyka»). (ukr)

 6. Kasyanova O. M. Pedahohitshna ekspertyza diyalnosti navtshalnoho zakladu [Pedagogical evaluation of activity of educational establishment]: navtshalno-metodytshnyy posibnyk / O. M. Kasyanova. – Kh.: Vydavnytsha hrupa «Osnova», 2012. – 128 s. (ukr)

 7.  Kasyanova O. M. Teoretyko-metodolohitshni zasady ekspertyzy v osviti [Theoretical and methodological principles of educational evaluation] / O. M. Kasyanova // Teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya sotsialnymy systemamy : shtshokvartalnyy nauk.-prakt. zghurn. – Kharkiv : NTU «KhPI», 2009. – №3. –  S. 19–28. (ukr)

 8.  Knjazeva M. M. Jekspertiza obrazovatel'nyh proektov [Evaluation of educational projects] /  M. M. Knjazeva // Shkol'nye tehnologii. – 2001. - №2. – S. 210-227. (rus)

 9.  Kruleht M.V., Tel'njuk I. V. Jekspertnye ocenki v obrazovanii [Educational evaluation]: ucheb. posobie dlja stud. fak. doshk. obrazovanija vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenij. — M.: Izdatel'skij centr «Akademija», 2002. — 112 s. (rus)

 10. Makarova E. A., Pal'mova E. A. Jevaljuacija kak neot"emlemaja sostavljajushhaja sistemy upravlenija sovremennym obrazovaniem [Evaluation as an essential component of the modern educational system administration] / E. A. Makarova, E. A. Pal'mova // Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal. – 2011. – T.8. - №2. – S. 19-32. (rus)

 11. Natsionalna stratehiya rozvytku osvity v Ukrayini na 2012-2021 rr.[National strategy of development of education  in Ukraine  2012-2021]– 37 s. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezghym dostupu: hppt: // www. mon.gov.ua/images/files/news/12/05/4455.pdf (ukr)

 12. Ohneviuk S., Sysoieva S. Osvitolohiia – naukovyi napriam intehrovanoho doslidzhennia sfery osvity [Osvitologia as the integrated scientific field of education research] / V. Ohneviuk, S. Sysoieva // Ridna shkola: shchomisiach. naukovo-ped. zhurn. – 2012. - №4/5. – S. 44-51. (ukr)

 13.Skvorskij  V. Ja. Metodika soglasovanija jekspertnyh ocenok obrazovatel'nyh koncepcij [Methodology of evaluation of educational conceptions] /  V.Ja. Skvorskij  //  Pedagogika. – 1994. – №4. – S. 39-43. (rus)

 14. Cherepanov V. S. Teoreticheskie osnovy pedagogicheskoj jekspertizy [Theoretical principles of educational evaluation]: dis. … doktora ped. nauk: 13.00.01 / Vjacheslav Sergeevich Cherepanov. – Glazov, 1990. – 351 s. (rus)

 15. Chechel' I. D., Potemkina T. V. Upravlencheskaja problema kak ob"ekt analiza jeksperta-konsul'tanta po voprosam razvitija obrazovanija [Administrative problem as object of the analyses of the expert-konsultant in a develeopment of education] / I. D Chechel',  T. V. Potemkina // Sovremennye issledovanija social'nyh problem (jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal).  – 2014. - №6. DOI: 10.12731/2218-7405-2014-6-23 (rus)

 

 Full Text:   PDF (ukr)

Cited-by:

Kulbashna, Y., & Astapenko, O. (2016). Educational assesment in training of competent doctors in Ukraine: problems and their decision. Osvitolohiya, 5. DOI:  10.28925/2226-3012.2016.5.173179