Ukrainian-Polish Yearbook OŚWIATOLOGIA/ОСВІТОЛОГІЯ

The article analyzes the phenomenon of the educational paradigm as a philosophical and pedagogical category.
The article states the importance of educational paradigms for the modernization and development of the educational sphere as a catalyst for shifts and qualitative transformations in it.
The aim of the article is the methodological substantiation of the educational program in the context of modern transformations in society.
Attention has been focused on the definitions «paradigm», «pedagogical paradigm», «educational paradigm».
The discourse of scientists about these concepts has been provided and the general and distinctive shades between them have been clarified. Various types of educational paradigms have been highlighted and grouped depending on the goals they carry in their contents.
Depending on the analysis carried out, it has been indicated that an educational paradigm always, in any historical era, acts as a paradigm idea of the development of education. It has been noted that the mission of pedagogy is in the change and dynamics of the educational paradigm as the one which provides the basis for innovative approaches to the development of education, the contents and organization of training and interaction among the main subjects of education.
The synergetic paradigm has been indicated as a new and innovative educational paradigm. Education can be considered as a synergetic system whose self-organization processes can be fully described by such categories as bifurcations, fluctuations, attractors, dissipative structures, etc. This circumstance leads to a revision of the established, traditional ideas about education and makes the basis for qualitative changes in its development.
Keywords: attractors; bifurcation states; dissipative structures; educational paradigm; fluctuations; paradigm; synergetic methodology; synergetic paradigm of education.

References

• Batechko, N. Gh. (2012). Akmesynerghetychna modelj pidghotovky vykladacha vyshhoji shkoly v umovakh maghistratury [Acmesynergetic model of higher school teacher training in the conditions of master’s degree]. Pedaghoghichnyj process, 5, 14–23 (ukr).

• Bermus, A. T. Kontekst y struktura paradyghmaljnogho podkhoda v sovremennoj teoryy obrazovanyja [Context and structure of the paradigmatic approach in the modern theory of education]. Elibrary. www. ebiblioteka.lt/resursai/Uzsienio%20leid (rus).

• Bondarevskaya, E. V. Pedagogika: lichnost’ v gumanisticheskikh teoriyakh i sistemakh vospitaniya [Pedagogy: personality in humanistic theories and systems of education]. Pedagogika Kul’tury. https://www. pedagogika-cultura.ru/po-rubrikam-3/problemy-obrazovaniya-formirovanie-dukhovnosti-i-kultury/bondarevskaya-e-v-gumanitarnaya-metodologiya-nauki-o-vospitanii (ukr).

• Bordovs’ka, N. V. & Rean, A. A. (2000). Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. Piter (ukr).

• Dem’janenko, N. (2006). Pedaghoghichna paradyghma vyshhoji shkoly Ukrajiny: gheneza j evoljucija [Different views on Europe and the design of educational concepts]. Filosofija osvity, 2 (4), 256–265 (ukr).

• Ghofron, A. (2005). Rizni poghljady na Jevropu i proektuvannja osvitnikh koncepcij [Different views on Europe and the design of educational concepts]. Vyshha osvita Ukrajiny, 1, 37–43 (ukr).

• Ghoncharenko, S. U. (1997). Ukrajinsjkyj pedaghoghichnyj slovnyk [Ukrainian pedagogical dictionary]. Lybidj (ukr).

• Gnitecki, I. (2006). Reformy w oswiacie-paradygmaty, strategie and uwarunrowania globalne. Encyklopedia Pedagogichna XXI wieku. T. V. Wyd.Akademichie «Zak» (pol).

• Kedrov, B. M. (1975). O nauchnykh revolyuciyakh [About scientific revolutions]. Nauka I zhizn’, 10, 54 (rus).

• Kremenj, V. (2003). Suchasnyj navchaljnyj proces jak synerghetychna systema. Osvitni reformy: misija, dijsnistj, refleksija [Modern educational process as a synergetic system. Educational reforms: mission, reality, reflection]. TOV «Vydavnyche pidpryjemstvo «Edeljvejs» (ukr).

• Kremenj, V. Gh. (2005). Osvita i nauka v Ukrajini — innovacijni aspekty. Strateghija. Realizacija. Rezuljtaty [Education and science in Ukraine — innovative aspects. Strategy. Realization]. Ghramota (ukr).

• Krysovatyj, A. (2015). Osnovni paradyghmy osvity ta jikh sutnisna kharakterystyka [Basic paradigms of education and their essential characteristics]. Psykhologhija i suspiljstvo, 1, 114–121 (ukr).

• Kun, T. (1997). Struktura nauchnykh revolyucij [The structure of scientific revolutions]. Progress (rus).

• Oghijenko, O. I. (2008). Tendenciji rozvytku osvity doroslykh u skandynavsjkykh krajinakh [Tendencies of development of adult education in the Scandinavian countries]. Elada (ukr).

• Oghnev’juk, V. O., & Sysojeva S. O. (Eds.). (2013). Osvitologhija: khrestomatija [Osvitology: a textbook]. VP «Edeljvejs» (ukr).

• Platonov, K. V. (1984). Kratkiy slovar sistemyi psihologicheskih ponyatiy [A short dictionary of the system of psychological concepts]. Vyisshaya shkola (rus).

• Predborsjka, I. (2006). Filosofsjki obrysy suchasnoji osvity [Philosophical outlines of modern education]. VTD «Universytetsjka knygha» (ukr).

• Romanenko, M. I. (2000). Osvitnja paradyghma: ghenezys idej ta system [Educational paradigm: genesis of ideas and systems]. Prominj (ukr).

• Selevko, G. K. (2006). Entsiklopediya obrazovatelnyih tehnologiy [Encyclopedia of educational technologies]. T. 1. Narodnoe obrazovanie (rus).

• Svitlychna, V. V., & Chystilina, T. O. (2013). Osvitnij prostir v umovakh ghlobalizaciji: paradyghmaljnyj pljuralizm i perspektyvy integhraciji. [Educational space in the context of globalization: paradigmatic pluralism and prospects for integration]. Ghumanitarnyj chasopys, 2, 83–92 (ukr).

• Sysojeva, S. O., & Sokolova, I. V. (2010). Problemy neperervnoji profesijnoji osvity: tezaurus naukovogho doslidzhennja [Problems of continuous professional education: thesaurus of scientific research]. Vydavnychyj Dim «EKMO» (ukr).

• Zjazjun, I. A. (2006). Osvitni paradyghmy ta pedaghoghichni tekhnologhiji u vymirakh filosofiji osvity [Educational paradigms and pedagogical technologies in the dimensions of the philosophy of education]. Naukovyj visnyk MDU imeni V. O. Sukhomlynsjkogho, 1.33, 22–26 (ukr).

• Zjazjun, I. A. (2008). Filosofiya pedahohichnoyi ideyi [Philosophy of pedagogical idea]. Vyd-vo vid CHNU imeni Bohdana Khmel’nyts’koho (ukr).

Article text (PDF)